I just turned off the DAO forum notification... It's not that I don't care, but the more I look, the more I realize that the most valuable part of proposals isn't "whether to do it or not," but "who holds the keys." Some incentives are written very gently, like subsidies, rebates, delegated rewards, but the power structure is directly locked: voting rights are concentrated, thresholds are raised, and execution authority is given to a few with multi-signature, leaving the community to just be an atmosphere group.

Recently, that mainstream public chain is planning an upgrade/maintenance, and people in the group are guessing whether the project will migrate. I actually want to see how these projects' DAOs will respond: will they use "migration subsidies" to pull people away, or use "emergency authorization" to take back decision-making power? To put it simply, don't just look at the proposal titles, first check who can execute, who gets rewarded, how the voting snapshot is set, and then decide whether to delegate your votes.