Lately, I've been really tense watching governance votes: a bunch of people entrust their votes to others, just to save trouble, and in the end, it turns into a few people holding the remote control of the entire community. They call it "community governance," but honestly, who does the governance tokens really govern? Maybe it's your emotions and time, and the rest is left to oligarchs to hold meetings.



What's even more ridiculous is that now AI Agents, automated trading, are also jumping into the mix, claiming to be able to "automatically participate in governance/on-chain interactions," with narratives flying high, but who’s responsible for safety? If the contract malfunctions or permissions are given to the wrong person, you can't even withdraw in time. I've seen too many accidents with cross-chain transactions; once votes go into a black box, you can't even find the responsible party.

What I fear most isn't losing money, but losing control—at least if you lose money, you know it's your own mistake; losing control means your hands are no longer on yourself. Anyway, I’d rather vote fewer times now than casually hand my votes to "well-known representatives"... for now, that's all.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin