Man, I see the controversy from Renato Ulianov calling those who bet on Bitcoin dropping to 74k in January and December "crypto influencer minerals." The guy even questioned the IQ of these influencers, which is pretty straightforward.

The interesting point is that while Renato Ulianov is criticizing these pessimistic predictions, Augusto Backes is insisting on exactly that scenario. But look, Bitcoin is at 80.7k now, already surpassing the level they predicted. I mean, reality might be proving Renato Ulianov right faster than they expected.

I don't know if his statement was arrogant or just really realistic. Renato Ulianov is a real trader, has a track record, but there's always this tension when someone questions the intelligence of other audiences, you know? What's your take on all this? Do you think he was right or did he overdo it?