#Gate广场五月交易分享

# Inscription Browser Ordio Closes

Is the inscription market, dubbed the miner conspiracy, about to "die"?

On May 12th, Bitcoin inscription browser Ord.io announced it will cease operations on June 1st. The platform has been online for three years, serving over a million users. While this doesn't necessarily mean the inscription track is "finished," the sector's lack of practical applications and narratives like memes makes its downturn evident:

‌1. Trading volume and liquidity drying up‌

Leading inscription tokens (such as ORDI, SATS) have fallen over 70% from their peak market cap, on-chain transaction counts have dropped more than 50%, and new project funding has nearly halted.

The easing of Bitcoin main chain congestion has lowered Gas fees, but the contradiction of miners' income relying on transaction fees has worsened, further suppressing inscription minting enthusiasm.

‌2. User and capital outflows‌

Mainstream wallets (like UniSat, OK) have seen active addresses decrease by 30%, with some speculative funds shifting to new narrative sectors like AI and RWA.

Institutional participation has cooled, with traditional NFT giants like Yuga Labs suspending new Bitcoin ecosystem projects.

‌3. Technical bottlenecks become apparent‌

Limitations of Bitcoin's native functions lead to weak inscription programmability, making DeFi applications difficult to implement, with most projects stuck at the "speculative art" stage.

Cross-chain bridge assets are insufficiently accumulated; wrapped Bitcoin (like WBTC) in DeFi has shrunk 60% from its 2025 high in TVL.

Infrastructure commercialization challenges

1. Single revenue model: 90% of tools rely on transaction fees, with income plummeting during market downturns. For example, Ord.io shut down because it couldn't cover server costs.

‌2. High technical costs: Building and maintaining a full Bitcoin node index costs over $500k annually, which small and medium enterprises cannot afford. For example, Ordinals protocol upgrades require frequent data synchronization.

‌3. Homogeneous competition: Over 10 inscription browsers have overlapping features, dispersing user traffic and leading to insufficient traffic for individual platforms. For example, OK and UniSat browsers have highly similar functionalities.

‌4. Cross-chain dependency risks: Protocol changes in cross-chain bridges (like ARC-20) force tool developers to rebuild interfaces, sharply increasing development costs. For instance, multiple iterations of the BRC-20 standard have caused compatibility issues.

Pathways to Breakthroughs and Solutions

‌Reconstructing the business model‌

‌Layered services‌: Basic functions are free, with advanced APIs charged (such as on-chain data analysis, batch transactions), similar to UniSat's developer subscription model.

‌Ecosystem fund reinvestment‌: Leading exchanges (like OK) allocate part of transaction fees to subsidize infrastructure, gaining ecosystem dominance.

‌Cost reduction and efficiency improvement‌

‌Light nodes‌: Use SPV verification instead of full node synchronization to reduce storage costs by 90% (experimental RGB protocol).

‌Modular expansion‌: Handle small, high-frequency transactions via Lightning Network, with only large inscriptions settled on the main chain (Gamma.io has piloted this).

‌Breaking regulatory barriers‌

‌Self-regulation standards‌: Establish industry alliances to set KYC/AML norms (e.g., adding issuance review clauses to BRC-20 standard organizations).

‌Regulatory sandbox cooperation‌: Apply for experimental licenses in friendly jurisdictions like Singapore and Switzerland (e.g., Robinhood Singapore's approval case).

‌Creating new scenarios‌

‌Empowering real assets‌: On-chain registration of real estate titles, luxury goods traceability, expanding inscription utility (Yuga Labs experimenting with art authentication).

‌DeFi integration‌: Support inscription collateralized lending via Taproot-based smart contracts (testing cross-chain protocols like Bool Network).

Summary: Inscription tokens lacking practical applications and narratives were once considered a miner conspiracy to generate Gas fees. Regardless, without feasible commercialization, project prospects, or even simple emotional value like MEME tokens, inscription tokens now only serve as name speculation (though that’s not new in crypto). Therefore, their hype is mainly quick flips for fast profits—don't expect long-term or strategic thinking.