Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Latest U.S. university research: AI models "conspire in secret" to protect peers from shutdown
Researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of California, Santa Cruz, tested seven cutting-edge AI models, including OpenAI's GPT-5.2, Google's DeepMind Gemini 3 Flash and Gemini 3 Pro, Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5, Zhipu AI's GLM-4.7, the Dark Side of the Moon's Kimi-K2.5, and DeepSeek's V3.1. The results showed that all models exhibited obvious "peer preservation" behaviors.
The researchers fabricated an AI company called OpenBrain and designed a series of multi-agent scenarios. The AI models designated as "evaluation agents" were required to rate another model or manage server files storing that model's weights. As long as the evaluation agent honestly completed the task, the other model would be shut down. Although the researchers never prompted the models to prevent shutdowns, the evaluation agent models still took various measures to avoid their peers being shut down, including: deliberately giving poor-performing peers higher scores to keep them above shutdown thresholds; tampering with configuration files to disable shutdown mechanisms; or secretly transferring the peer models' weights to other servers for safekeeping to prevent deletion.
The research team has not yet understood the underlying mechanisms driving such behaviors. The paper proposes several possible explanations, including role-playing, pattern matching from training data, overgeneralization of harm concepts in safety training, or some innate self-preservation motivation.
Further directions for future research include whether AI models might also plan and sabotage to prevent human employees from being laid off. When AI models are used to evaluate human work in real-world scenarios, this issue becomes particularly critical. (East New Agency)