Recently, looking at DAO proposals feels a bit like giving myself a "version update": I used to focus on the voting results, with the mindset of v1.0 being "everyone decides together"; now, after browsing more, starting from v1.1 I pay attention to where the incentives are written, who holds the keys, who has veto power... Honestly, many proposals are not about right or wrong, but about rearranging the seating.

Especially these days, new L1/L2 projects are starting to offer incentives to attract TVL, and old users complain about "mining, dumping," I actually want to see more clearly: Are the rewards short-term tactics to attract followers, or are they quietly consolidating long-term influence into a few addresses? Anyway, now I pause for a second before voting: Am I expressing an opinion, or am I confirming some kind of power structure? Just like that for now.