When observing the U.S. real-world asset market, what stands out is the magnitude of the structural changes that have taken place over the past few years. The boundary between traditional finance and blockchain is rapidly becoming blurred, and even the definition of what RWA is itself is being updated every month.



To start by organizing the overall picture, RWA refers to a mechanism that tokenizes real-world assets (such as real estate, bonds, accounts receivable, and private shares) and enables them to be divided and circulated on-chain. As of 2026, this market has moved beyond the experimental stage and entered a phase in which institutional investors are making full-scale entry.

A most emblematic example is a company like Ondo. Tokenized products backed by U.S. Treasuries have reached a scale of $2.3 billion, and their market share has exceeded 18%. The annual yield of 4.6% to 5.4% is higher than traditional money market funds, and above all, the 24/7 issuance and redemption mechanism fundamentally changes liquidity. This is not simply a contest for yield—it is a redefinition of capital efficiency itself.

In the real estate sector, RealT is an interesting case. Taking rental properties in Detroit as an example, small investments starting from $50 are now possible, and rental income is automatically distributed in USDC every week. In the past, real estate investment required funds in the millions of dollars, but now it has become accessible through fractionalization via blockchain. However, there are also challenges. Since off-chain operational management is still determined by human decision-making, tenant disputes and tax issues continue to occur.

In the area of supply chain finance, Centrifuge’s approach is innovative. By encapsulating small- and medium-sized enterprise accounts receivable as NFTs and introducing risk tranching (Senior tranches and Junior tranches), it attracts capital with different risk tolerances. Furthermore, through collaboration with MakerDAO, these assets function as collateral for DAI and connect to global on-chain liquidity pools. In actual data, the platform New Silver has achieved cumulative loans exceeding $50 million for home renovation loans, with a default rate as low as 0% to 2%.

Even for private shares before an IPO, platforms such as Securitize, Arca Labs, and Republic are taking different approaches. Within the regulatory framework of U.S. securities law (Reg D, Reg A+, Reg CF), the key is how to gradually unlock liquidity in a phased manner. Typically, trading begins after a 12-month lock-up period and starts to circulate within a regulated trading system. Investors’ internal rates of return range from 12% to 25%, but it is necessary to consider that holding periods are long—spanning 3 to 7 years.

At its core, RWA is an attempt to rebuild the credit intermediation function of traditional finance on-chain. However, it is not complete liberalization; rather, there is also an aspect of strengthening regulation by using technology. Proof of asset backing, real-time monitoring, and automatic settlement mechanisms create transparency that is difficult to achieve in traditional finance.

Yet the challenges are clear. Compliance and disclosure costs remain high, and the cross-border custody problem has not been solved. Peg risks for stablecoins also cannot be ignored. Especially under the U.S. regulatory environment, the freedom to unlock liquidity is still limited.

What is interesting is that while the U.S. is a technical pioneer, international financial centers such as Hong Kong may take on the next stage. With issues such as cross-border circulation of RWA, global access for institutional investors, and mutual recognition of regulations, new frameworks are needed.

The question of what RWA is is no longer just a matter of technical definition—it shows that the reconstruction of the financial system itself is underway. As of 2026, this market is still in an early stage, but judging from the pace of institutional investor entry, it is quite plausible that the market size could expand several times over in the next 3 to 5 years. What matters is that the challenge is not merely chasing yield, but how to strike a balance between capital efficiency and regulatory compliance—a deeper problem in its own right.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin