Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I've been gradually reducing my Bitcoin position over the past few months, and I want to share why I'm becoming more cautious about the next BTC bull run, even though I'm still holding a meaningful amount.
For context, BTC used to be my largest asset position. During this cycle, I closed my leverage at 70k, then trimmed from full holdings down to about 30% somewhere between 100-120k. I added small amounts during dips (50k+ in 2024, 60k in early 2025), all based on long-term conviction. But here's the thing—when BTC bounced to 78-79k recently, I cut my position further instead of accumulating like the traditional cycle playbook suggests. That decision came after serious deliberation, and it reflects a shift in how I'm thinking about where this bull run actually goes.
The core issue is that the momentum driving the next phase of Bitcoin adoption looks weaker than before. If you map out the previous cycles, each one expanded the investor base dramatically—from crypto nerds to mainstream retail to institutions to giant funds like BlackRock. That narrative kept playing out. But here's where it gets tricky: the next logical step would be getting Bitcoin onto sovereign nation balance sheets. We're talking central banks, major sovereign wealth funds beyond just Abu Dhabi, maybe even US state treasuries as reserves. That's the only lever left that could really move the needle for a major bull run.
Except it's not happening. The whole "Federal Reserve will buy Bitcoin" story got crushed last year. Even at the peak of excitement in early 2025, when over 20 US states were pushing Bitcoin reserve legislation, most of it stalled. Only a handful passed anything meaningful. Central banks globally? Zero interest. Bitcoin's track record is too short, volatility is too extreme, and gold already exists as a proven alternative. Getting into central bank reserves is incredibly hard.
Secondly, my personal calculus has shifted. I've found some genuinely compelling companies at attractive valuations lately, and they're becoming my main focus instead of rotating more into Bitcoin. Opportunity cost matters.
Then there's the elephant in the room: the crypto industry itself is contracting. Most Web3 narratives—socialfi, gamefi, depin, distributed storage—have been quietly proven false. Only DeFi generates real cash flow, and even that's been mediocre in the second half of this cycle because there aren't enough quality native assets to work with. When the entire industry base shrinks and practitioners leave, Bitcoin demand and consensus erode with it. Hyperliquid is the rare exception growing against the trend, but that's mostly just stealing market share from centralized exchanges and adding non-crypto assets. It doesn't really transfer value to Bitcoin.
Here's another concern: MicroStrategy, the largest listed Bitcoin buyer and holder, is facing rising financing costs. Their perpetual preferred stock (STRC) is already at 11.5% interest rates, and they're about to switch from monthly to bi-weekly payments just to keep the market price stable. I'm not saying they're heading toward collapse, but as the biggest net buyer, any slowdown in their purchasing power creates significant selling pressure. And honestly, almost every other Bitcoin-focused stock that was hot a few years ago is dead. MicroStrategy is alone out there.
Also worth considering: tokenized gold. Bitcoin's value prop was being "electronic gold"—better divisibility, portability, verifiability, decentralized. But now you've got tokenized gold that matches Bitcoin on all those fronts and it's scaling fast. Yes, it relies on centralized credit, but so do stablecoins, which are basically the backbone of crypto infrastructure. That competitive advantage is narrowing.
Finally, there's the persistent security budget problem. Each Bitcoin halving makes this worse, and attempts to solve it through inscriptions and L2 fees haven't really worked. It's an old concern but still a real one.
Do I think Bitcoin is going to zero? No. I'm still bullish long-term and I'm still holding a meaningful position. But my expectations for where the next bull run actually peaks have come down. If conditions change—if sovereign adoption actually starts happening, if the crypto industry stabilizes, if MicroStrategy's financing situation improves—I'd consider buying back. But right now, the setup for an explosive next cycle feels less obvious than it did even six months ago.