The main idea of "changing the soup but not the medicine" is to make money.

Recently, various things on the chain have emerged, with a series of new terms coming one after another, but ultimately it can be found that they are all "changing the soup but not the medicine."
Various Alpha groups have also revived, competing to operate.
Of course, various developers have also started working again; if they can't "modify and innovate in the first step," they just fork.
You will see all kinds of so-called "imitation projects" also come out.
But it's not a big problem, after all, the ones being "copied" don't have much height.
You will find that the "multipliers" are indeed very high, but the "absolute value" is generally low.
All kinds of slogans that were once very "FOMO" are re-emerging.
The result is still the same group of people, but the height is getting lower and lower.
Has everyone already withdrawn their funds? 😭
Still playing something simple, without price advantage, without cost advantage, without extremely innovative features, then I won't touch it.
Unless you tell me Musk really brought goods again 😧.
Every year, playing with innovation on Uni, but in the end, what does it have to do with Uni?
I don't understand or get it, but I respect it. After all, everyone is having fun, even if they didn't make money.
Last time when everyone was FOMO on Uni, it was said that the switch was turned on, once went 14 times, another time 7, now it's 4.
How does this benefit more and more, with prices getting lower and lower? 😮‍💨.
Oh dear, how dangerous and high it is!
If you understand, play simple; if you're played simply by others, where exactly is it simple?