People in the group are again sharing rumors about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and de-pegging, repeating like a parrot... What bothers me more is: a bunch of people start conspiracy theories just because they see "coincidental transfers" on the chain. To put it simply, many of these are just because the path isn't broken down: A→Aggregator/Exchange hot wallet→Internal consolidation→then transferred to B, with fees, change, batch payments, or even cross-chain bridge transfers mixed in. If you only focus on the last transaction, of course it looks like a "coincidence."


I usually connect transactions within the same time window, same gas habits, similar contract interactions, and known tagged addresses. Those that can be explained are first considered as "process," and those that can't are treated as anomalies.
Don’t let emotions drive you; on-chain data is like a maze and a puzzle. Take your time, and it won’t seem so mysterious.
I’m also too lazy to click on links, so I’ll just post the addresses first and then chat.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned