In the past few days, I've been observing discussions about on-chain privacy and compliance, and my feeling is: ordinary users shouldn't treat "on-chain" as a cloak of invisibility, nor should they see it as a black box that could be wiped out at any moment. Frankly, the default expectation should be — transaction records are there long-term, and if you're targeted, it's not about whether you know how to use tools, but whether what you're doing complies with regulations and whether you've left any tangible evidence in the real world.



I personally prefer to take it a bit slower: don't bind all addresses to the same entry point just to save two minutes, and don't give out permissions randomly just for the sake of "convenience." The previous cycle of blockchain games with inflation, studio involvement, and spiraling token prices was too fast, to the point that everyone was just rushing forward, and in the end, no one even saw where the risks were.

Slowing down is also good; it allows for a peaceful sleep. As long as the nodes stay online, I’ll just take a nap first.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned