Lately I've been translating some obscure addresses, and the more I look at it, the more I think on-chain "privacy" is not something to have too many illusions about... Frankly, not showing your face proactively doesn't mean others can't see you. Compliance isn't a clear-cut black and white line; it's more like warm water: it's fine today, but if rules change tomorrow, your actions yesterday can suddenly become very conspicuous.

Now everyone is comparing RWA, or even U.S. Treasury yields, to on-chain yield products. I understand the impulse to look for "more stable" options, but the closer they are to traditional methods, the easier it is to be judged by traditional standards. The expectations ordinary users should have are probably: the traces will eventually be uncovered, it's just a matter of cost.

I don't have any clever tricks myself, just more of a habit: avoid tying your identity and wallet too tightly, don't pile a bunch of stories on one address,拆 (break down) what you can, sign less if possible. In the long run, privacy isn't a gift; it's the small actions you persist in doing daily because it's inconvenient.