Recently, everyone has been talking about AI Agents automatically running on-chain interactions.

I think it can save effort, but for truly "full automation," someone still needs to be the backup.
Contract authorization, route selection and pool choosing, miscalculating slippage/fees, and temporary issues with cross-chain bridges—no matter how smart the Agent is, it's easy to run into problems at the edges.
Honestly, it’s just executing according to the rules you give it.

Especially these past two days, the group has been repeatedly discussing stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and various rumors about "de-pegging."
When emotions run high, on-chain liquidity can suddenly thin out, spreads might bubble up, but it also makes it easier to get caught in bad trades.
My approach remains conservative: the Agent can monitor spreads and simulate trades, but for large transactions, changing authorizations, or interacting with unfamiliar new contracts, I still prefer to confirm manually—better to be slow than sorry.

Anyway, this isn’t about fate; it’s about probability: leaving the most error-prone steps to humans can reduce the overall risk of accidents.
That’s all for now.