Lately, I've been hearing people say "Rising stablecoin supply = a big market is coming" and "ETF inflows = on-chain explosion," and I find it a bit uncomfortable... Correlation is often very misleading. More stablecoins might mean ammunition waiting for opportunities, or it could just be market making, arbitrage, or even risk being kept off-chain first; ETF changes are more like switching the container of an off-exchange position, and may not align with on-chain risk appetite.



Especially recently, some places tightening and loosening taxes and compliance, and expectations for deposits and withdrawals shifting, make funds more likely to stay on the sidelines first: buying a "compliant ticket" doesn’t mean they’re willing to jump into high-volatility pools immediately. Frankly, I prefer to treat it as a thermometer, not a match.

When it comes to security, I’m willing to go the extra mile: every time I add a new protocol, I first run a small test to check the withdrawal path, then review all permissions and authorizations. It’s a bit troublesome, but at least I won’t be woken up by that sharp sound of “funds have been transferred out” right before bed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin