L2 is arguing again about TPS, fees, and subsidies—who’s more aggressive. I’m toasting bread while watching it all unfold; it’s lively, but really, it still comes down to not letting the “credibility” part collapse. Beginners want to read GitHub/audits/upgrades for multi-signature, and my low-effort way is: first, check whether there’s actually real work happening on GitHub recently (not just people changing the README), then skim the audit reports for “fixed/not fixed/risk accepted” and see whether they say it in plain human language—don’t just stare at the audit company’s logo. Upgrading multi-signature is also pretty important: who the signers are, how many signatures are required, whether signers can be temporarily replaced… It’s like my computer backups: having more backups doesn’t mean they’re secure—what matters is where the backups are stored, who can delete them, and whether you can recover them if something goes wrong. Anyway, I’ll wait until the project clearly explains these “backup locations” before thinking about turning up the heat.