Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
The Fed leadership change is coming soon: Уош will become the new head; disagreements within the FOMC in April are the most serious since 1992
On the early morning of April 30, 2026, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve (ФРС) decided, by a vote of 8 to 4, to leave the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged—3.50%–3.75%—without changing it for the third time in a row. However, behind a decision that outwardly appears to match market expectations lies the sharpest policy disagreement in history since October 1992.
The split among the 4 votes against is especially dramatic: board member Джефф Стивен? (appointed by Trump) supported a 25 basis point rate cut. Federal Reserve Chair of Cleveland Бетс Хаммарк, Federal Reserve Chair of Minneapolis Нил Кашкари, and Federal Reserve Chair of Dallas Лори Логан—together all three—supported keeping rates unchanged, but they strongly opposed retaining in the statement language with a dovish (liberal) tilt, such as “further adjustments.”
This is a very rare split by direction in the history of the Fed: among the four dissenters, one called for a softer policy, while the other three favored a more “hawkish” stance. Within the Fed, a fundamental divergence has already emerged in assessments of the inflation path, the transmission of energy shocks, and the outlook for the economy—and this rift is precisely arising in the key window when Chair Powell’s term is coming to an end, with Уош already being lined up to succeed him.