Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Just caught something interesting that's been circulating in crypto circles. There's this Twitter sleuth called Pledditor who's been raising some serious questions about how Bitcoin treasury companies actually work, and honestly, the mechanics they're describing are pretty wild.
So here's the gist of what Pledditor laid out recently. Apparently, some of the early Bitcoin holders with massive bags could theoretically securitize their holdings through treasury companies. The play goes like this: launch a treasury firm, hype it up on Twitter, get retail investors to buy common stock. Then once the market net asset value hits 10x, the founders can exit their common shares while keeping preferred shares for themselves. On paper, if Bitcoin is trading at $80K and mNAV is 10x, they're technically selling their Bitcoin at $800K without actually leaving the company. Pretty clever from a certain angle, right?
What I found most interesting about the Pledditor analysis is how they pointed out that these early Bitcoin OGs aren't even selling from their actual reserves. The Bitcoin they're using came from before, so there's supposedly zero market impact. But here's where it gets murky: retail investors think they're getting direct Bitcoin exposure when really the founders own all the preferred shares and control all the Bitcoin.
Pledditor also drew a parallel to SPACs that honestly makes sense. Special purpose acquisition companies came back strong in the early 2020s and most of them turned out to be pretty rough for everyday investors. The comparison suggests that treasury companies might be following a similar playbook—all speculation, no actual utility. Both structures don't produce anything tangible.
The risk angle is real too. If Bitcoin drops significantly, some of these newer treasury companies don't have proper safeguards. One analyst mentioned that if BTC goes below $90K, it could trigger liquidations that ripple through the entire sector.
As for which treasuries have actually hit that 10x mNAV threshold Pledditor mentioned? According to recent SEC filings, GameStop and Nakamoto are already above 10, while Metaplanet and Strive are sitting around 7.6 and 9.1 respectively. GameStop's situation is a bit different though since it had a huge market cap before allocating Bitcoin.
The criticism toward these treasury structures keeps growing as more companies jump on the trend. Whether Pledditor's concerns are completely fair or if there's legitimate value here is still being debated, but the mechanics they're describing are definitely worth understanding if you're watching this space.