As a PVP loser of sat1

What I want to publish is:
My idea of buying sat1 is indeed to covet Long Wang’s influence—to try Ping once and give it to the next person who’s fated to receive it.
Of course, I’m also willing to take the loss and accept defeat.
If you can P and beat me, that’s your ability.
If I can P and beat you, that’s my ability.
It’s not like, once you make money, you say Long Wang is awesome.
And once you lose money, you say A9 is cutting people.
The crypto world is full of nothing but giant babies.
If you can prove your superiority just by stepping on someone’s foot, then you’re indeed a useless person.
It also shows you truly envy the other party—holding to the belief that if you can’t get it, you’ll destroy it.
I’ve also scolded He Yi and CZ. They’re indeed impressive, but that doesn’t stop me from criticizing them.
In the market, I uphold the idea that whoever makes money is the best, whoever can make me money is the most awesome.