I saw a perspective from Sato. What does everyone think?

$sat0 It might really be designed, the so-called mechanism.
The continuously expanding internal spread between buy and sell orders is to prevent rapid sell-offs from arbitrage.
It maintains the survival of the order book through sufficient turnover in the secondary liquidity and mid-price setting.
This is also where SAT1 fails; no one voluntarily holds at the bottom (like Satoshi Nakamoto giving up tokens).
Mid-level turnover is so easy; sell whenever you want, inevitably leading to chaos, making it impossible to reach consensus.
Once a certain threshold or limit is reached, it can continue to be pushed upward, accumulating hooks into the bottomless pool.
Like how Bitcoin accumulates consensus in a bull market, and in a bear market, a sufficient buy order is formed at a consensus price.
Reaching 20.79 million will lead to a fully deflationary model; it will only burn.
You can use all the E in the pool as a safety net, allowing distrustful people to completely exit and destroy to achieve deflation.
Linear price reduction occurs as tokens are burned.
After burning a certain amount and lowering the price, it’s a reasonable point to exit.
The spread between burn price and current price will be minimal, making it easier to exit.
With a reasonable valuation, the secondary market can resume buying.
Like Bitcoin’s every bull and bear cycle, the subsequent bottom is reached through consensus.
So I see his goal as pushing forward and maintaining a positive cycle.
Everyone will buy and sell at different times, but holding will win, just like Bitcoin—mined until the end, but some disappear, some are lost, some sell out.
Holders become the biggest winners in deflation.
With a supply of 20.79 million, $5, and a market cap of 100 million, after $1.2, roughly another 600+ E needs to be invested, plus the process of absorbing and releasing pressure in the middle.
Hope more people understand and pass this message on.