Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Just caught something interesting from the BlackRock side that's worth thinking about. You know who Larry Fink is, right? The guy running BlackRock, one of the biggest investment firms on the planet. He just threw out this idea that's been bouncing around my head—computing power could eventually become tradable like oil or commodities futures.
Think about it for a second. Right now, everyone's scrambling for GPU access, data center capacity, semiconductor chips. It's becoming the real bottleneck in AI development, not the money or the ideas. Fink's basically saying that as this shortage gets tighter, we might see actual futures markets pop up around computing capacity. Companies could lock in access to computational resources years ahead, kind of like how energy companies hedge power costs.
What's interesting is how he's framing the whole AI situation. He's pushing back on the bubble narrative hard. His take? It's not speculation that's the problem—it's that we don't have enough infrastructure to meet demand. That's actually a pretty bullish read if you think about it. Supply constraints usually mean real scarcity, not hype.
The infrastructure race is already wild. Tech companies are dropping billions into data centers, competing for chips, securing power supplies. Semiconductors have become the real prize in this game. We're seeing supply chain pressures already, which validates what Larry Fink is observing.
If computing power actually becomes a tradable asset like he's suggesting, that changes how companies plan their AI expansion. Instead of fighting for spot market access, they'd be buying futures contracts to secure capacity. It mirrors how traditional industries manage commodity risks.
The broader implication? This isn't just tech hype. This is about how AI infrastructure is becoming one of the defining economic assets. Energy, semiconductors, data centers—these aren't secondary anymore. They're central to how the next phase of growth plays out.
Energy constraints are real though. Running massive AI systems eats enormous amounts of power, which is why you're seeing renewed interest in nuclear and renewable energy infrastructure. The bottleneck might not even be chips anymore—it could be electricity.
So when someone like who larry fink is—a major institutional player—starts talking about commoditizing computing power, it's worth paying attention. It suggests we're moving past the pure software and application phase into infrastructure as a core economic layer. That's a meaningful shift in how digital assets get valued and traded.