Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
California Judge Tentatively Denies TikTok's Section 230 Dismissal Bid
California Judge Tentatively Denies TikTok’s Section 230 Dismissal Bid
Khac Phu Nguyen
Fri, February 20, 2026 at 4:24 AM GMT+9 2 min read
In this article:
GOOG
+0.25%
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
A California judge has indicated that TikTok Inc. may need to defend itself against allegations that its platform design harms young users, potentially narrowing the scope of the company’s long-standing reliance on Section 230 protections. In a tentative ruling, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Beth McGowen signaled that TikTok’s motion to dismiss under the Communications Decency Act could face resistance, reasoning that the state’s claims are directed at the platform’s structural features rather than its role as a publisher of user content. A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, giving TikTok an opportunity to challenge the court’s preliminary conclusions before a final ruling is issued.
The lawsuit, filed in 2024 by California, New York, a dozen additional states and the District of Columbia, alleges under consumer protection laws that TikTok and its Beijing-based parent ByteDance Ltd. mislead users regarding child safety tools. The states point to features such as autoplay, infinite scrolling and livestreams, which they contend are designed in ways that could keep young users engaged for longer periods. They also cite beauty filters, arguing that these tools may negatively affect children’s self-esteem and mental health. The judge’s tentative reasoning suggests the court may treat these allegations as challenges to product design decisions rather than disputes over third-party content.
For investors, the broader legal landscape remains relevant. TikTok, along with Snap Inc. (NYSE:SNAP), Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META), is facing thousands of lawsuits brought on behalf of young people who attribute mental health struggles to social media use. The first jury trial tied to those claims is currently under way in Los Angeles Superior Court. While the ultimate outcome of the California case remains uncertain, the court’s early posture could signal that litigation risks tied to platform design not just content moderation may increasingly influence how major social media companies are evaluated from a regulatory and risk perspective.
Condiciones y Política de privacidad
Privacy Dashboard
More Info