Recently, going through project materials has been a bit exhausting, but I’m still at it… To be honest, for someone like me who’s a newbie, I only look at “credibility” through three things: Is the GitHub active (not just updating the README), Has the audit report clearly outlined the scope and unresolved issues (don’t jump to “audited = safe”), and who actually holds the upgrade permissions—multiple signatures, what’s the threshold, is there any delay, the most feared thing is a single phrase “emergency upgrade” that can move your funds. Recently, the security setup for staking/sharing has been criticized as a copy-paste job, which I can understand. The appeal of stacking yields sounds attractive, but permissions + dependencies layered on top of each other—when something goes wrong, you don’t even know who to blame… Anyway, I’d rather earn a little less now, first understand the chain and contract permissions clearly, run where it’s cheap, but don’t fall into a trap.