Actually, everyone understands that DAO voting is on the surface "community consensus," but when you open the proposal text, it often feels like searching for Easter eggs: who gets incentives, who can nominate, whose voting power quietly becomes heavier... Basically, it's about seating arrangements. A few days ago, I even specifically looked at the incentive clauses before voting, and I almost accidentally clicked "approve" on the "participate and get some candy" part. After thinking calmly: is this candy meant to encourage participation, or to buy your silence? Recently, someone also used ETF capital flows and U.S. stock market risk appetite to explain crypto market rises and falls. I just want to say, no matter how big the macro narrative is, your wallet will still be changed by a proposal that alters the rules. Laugh if you want, but before voting, I now check three things first: who benefits, who makes the decision, and whether my opposition is effective... That's it for now.