Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Been looking at bond ETFs lately and noticed something interesting when comparing IGIB and MUB. On the surface they look similar - both are iShares funds holding thousands of bonds - but they're actually pretty different animals.
First, the numbers. IGIB (corporate bonds, 5-10 year) has a slightly lower expense ratio at 0.04% versus MUB's 0.05%. IGIB also yields more at 4.6% compared to MUB's 3.1%. One-year returns favor IGIB too - 3.8% vs 1.4%. Looks like a clear win for IGIB on paper, right?
Here's where it gets interesting though. Over five years, IGIB took a bigger hit during downturns - max drawdown of 20.63% versus MUB's 11.88%. If you'd invested $1,000 five years ago, IGIB would've left you with $905 while MUB got you to $944. So the higher yield came with more volatility.
The real difference is what these funds actually hold. IGIB focuses on investment-grade corporate bonds from companies like Meta and Bank of America. You're essentially betting on corporate credit - if companies do well financially and rates stay stable, you make money. IGIB has over 3,000 holdings so single-issuer risk is pretty low.
MUB is completely different. It holds over 6,200 municipal bonds - think state and local government debt, university bonds, that kind of thing. The big appeal here is tax free income at the federal level. That's huge if you're in a high tax bracket and holding this in a taxable account.
So here's the real decision: Do you want higher nominal yield or tax efficiency? IGIB gives you more stated income but you pay taxes on it. MUB gives you less income on paper, but it's tax free. In a taxable account, that tax advantage can actually close the yield gap pretty significantly depending on your tax situation.
The risk profiles are different too. Corporate bonds get hit harder when the economy slows - companies might struggle to pay. Municipal bonds are more tied to government finances and tax policy, so they behave differently in downturns.
Neither is objectively better. It really depends on your tax bracket, whether you're in a taxable or retirement account, and how much volatility you can stomach. If you're looking for tax free growth potential and can handle lower stated yields, MUB makes sense. If you want maximum income and can handle the tax bill plus more volatility, IGIB works. Most people probably benefit from holding both in different account types.