Recently looking at a bunch of "address profiling/tag clustering" charts, the more I look, the more I feel they can only be used as telescopes, not as IDs. Transferring a few times on-chain, mixing, crossing chains, and the profile immediately becomes distorted; some so-called "smart money" tags, frankly, might just be the same group of operations/market makers changing masks, or deliberately feeding data.



These days, cross-chain bridges are having issues again, and oracles reported outrageous prices. Everyone is collectively "waiting for confirmation," but I can understand: no matter how beautiful the tags are, they can't hide the real risks. I look at fund flows, but mostly to assist in judging sentiment and crowding, and if I really want to draw conclusions, I go back to the simplest—contract risks, permissions, penalty mechanisms, and who takes the blame if something goes wrong. As long as nodes stay online, don’t hand over your brain to the tagging system.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned