Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
These days, there's been more arguing in the DAO about whether secondary markets should be forced to pay royalties. It's both funny and frustrating: everyone claims to support creators, but when it's their own order book, they start calculating whether that 0.x% is "being taken." Honestly, the issue of royalties isn't a technical problem; it's about whether people are willing to pay for content long-term.
What's even more ridiculous is that the same group of people compare RWA and U.S. Treasury yields to on-chain yield products, focusing on "stable returns"; yet they complain that creator royalties are "not market-driven enough." Anyway, I now always review proposal details before voting to see if it's about protecting creators or just giving trading a better experience... That's how it is for now.