Why do Americans always keep shifting back and forth, swinging left and right?

Why does the U.S. sometimes launch two strikes and other times stop to negotiate, always swinging and dangling everyone?
Do you think it's because they can't win? Or because they can't afford the military expenses?
Many say it's to force other countries' oil wells to stop and seize the oil market—half right, but they haven't grasped the real core.
Isn't it because they don't want to completely take over the Middle East once and for all? Of course not.
Because total peace and full-scale war are both unprofitable for the U.S.
It's like running a casino—neither wanting all the guests to leave nor the house to get wrecked.
The best state is to keep the game forever hanging, with everyone's eyes fixed on your hand.
If peace is achieved, oil prices will keep falling, U.S. shale oil producers can't earn excess profits, and global capital won't hold dollars for risk hedging—breaking the foundation of the petrodollar.
If full-scale war breaks out, a single closure of the Strait of Hormuz can send global oil prices out of control, hitting U.S. inflation, and dragging the country into a war quagmire costing trillions in military expenses—losses outweigh the gains.
Only this kind of controlled turbulence—striking twice and pausing for three days—is the optimal solution:
Raising oil prices to profit from energy spreads, forcing global capital to flow back, the military-industrial complex making huge profits, and using energy as leverage over all oil-importing countries.
Everyone thinks that swinging left and right shows no ability to make a decisive move, but in reality, they never intended to land the hammer from the start.
The ultimate logic of war has never been about winning or losing, but about利益;
The highest level of manipulation is never about a decisive conquest, but about an ever-hovering blade—always ready, always poised, everyone knows it! #看K公社 #美伊冲突再升级