After I muted the group, I felt much more refreshed...


No more being bombarded with "AI Agent is about to take off" or "auto-trading full-chain closed loop" messages,
finally allowing my brain to focus on real work.

Recently, when I check if a project is serious about doing things, I instead look at how the treasury spends:
it's not about spending less, but about spending "correctly."
Can the money spent be linked to milestones, such as code commits, audit reports, bug bounties, document updates—things that can be traced back?
I'm most worried about budgets that look great on paper but end up with all expenses being "market cooperation/ecosystem incentives,"
on-chain transactions go round and round, making people's eyes blur, but there's little movement in product and security.

Especially now that everyone loves to do on-chain automated interactions,
to put it simply, the security threshold is higher:
I feel more confident if the treasury first invests in audits, permission management, and risk control monitoring;
on the other hand, if they first focus on narratives and KOLs,
I silently check the authorizations three more times and decide not to join in the fun.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin