People keep talking about how awesome modular blockchains are. Honestly, for end users, most of the time you don't really feel the words "modular" at all. You only care about: transfers not getting stuck, fees not being outrageous, cross-chain operations not feeling like a maze. If modularity really changes anything, it's just breaking down these experiences to optimize them—faster execution, no data congestion, more stable settlements. In the end, on your phone, it just feels like "a tap and it's done."



But don't overhype it either. Whether the experience is good or not often depends on how the team assembles it, whether the token model is just a forced story. Recently, on-chain data tools and tagging systems have been criticized for lagging and being misleading. I actually think that’s quite fitting: the underlying layers can be broken down however you want, but if the information layer users see is messy or leads them astray, they’ll still stumble. Anyway, when I pick projects, I still look at the people first, then see how they hide complex stuff... I don’t need to be understood, but I also don’t want to be treated like a chives-collecting fool.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin