I've always believed that the most important aspect of on-chain investigations isn't traffic, but consistent evidence standards.

But the biggest controversy surrounding @ZACHXBT in recent years has precisely been about standards.
Some projects, he will open more than ten threads in a row;
Some controversies, he only touches on them briefly.
Sometimes he asks others to provide a complete fund flow,
but when it’s his turn, he just says:
It's just handling the tokens received.
This sense of disparity is actually the reason why many people start to feel resentful.
Because what everyone is truly worried about is never whether he has an opinion, but whether:
There is selective bias behind these opinions.