Many people automatically associate @ZACHXBT with being the "on-chain justice advocate."

But honestly, if you look into some of his past controversies, it's not all that clean.
The "Justice for ZachXBT" meme coin incident back then has always been quite controversial.
On one hand, he claimed he did investigations without making money, but on the other hand, the project team directly gave him a large amount of tokens.
Later, the project pumped the coin, added liquidity pools, and withdrew liquidity, causing the price to plummet from its high point to zero, and the whole process was not very graceful.
The most critical issue isn't actually "whether he can sell coins."
It's that someone who has built influence by "exposing others" might find their role very delicate if they start participating deeply in these highly volatile meme plays.
Because often, the market's standards for ordinary KOLs and "justice investigators" are simply not the same.
If another project team or KOL engaged in similar actions, they would probably be called out in long threads already.
So what people are questioning now isn't really how much he made.
It's that, as a judge, if he also joins in the game, how much public trust remains.