Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I just saw the new Forbes ranking of the richest people in India, and frankly, it's interesting how things are changing, or rather, how they remain the same at the top. Mukesh Ambani continues to dominate the scene with a net worth that has reached $105 billion — he is literally the only one in India to achieve centibillionaire status. He maintains this position firmly. What’s more striking, however, is another fact: the total wealth of the 100 richest men in the country has decreased by 9% this year. That’s not insignificant, considering how slowly these numbers usually move. Right after Ambani, we find Gautam Adani with his family, who have accumulated $92 billion — still an enormous figure but still far from the leader’s wealth. In third place is Savitri Jindal with her family, with $40.2 billion, reaffirming her status as the wealthiest woman in the country. What emerges is quite clear: large Indian industrial families continue to control most of the national wealth, even when the market shows signs of instability. This pattern has been repeating for years. But I wonder if this contraction in total wealth is really only related to market instability or if there are other factors at play. What do you think about these numbers?