Someone asked, "Is GitHub with so many stars really reliable?"…

Right now, I look at project credibility like choosing a vinyl record: no matter how fancy the cover, you still need to flip to the small print on the back.
I mainly look at three things on GitHub: whether updates are continuous, whether PRs/issues are being addressed, and whether the key code is suddenly changed all at once;
For audit reports, don’t just look at "passed," check if the scope is clearly written, and whether issues have been followed up and fixed—otherwise, it’s just a sticker.
Upgrading multi-signature is even more critical: who are the signers, how many keys are needed, and can the rules be changed arbitrarily?
Anyway, I’d rather be slow than wake up one day to find the contract upgraded and I’ve been "arranged."
Recently, everyone’s been complaining about MEV and unfair ordering, and I resonate a bit: on-chain rules are not transparent, which easily crushes retail investors’ confidence.
That’s all for now—stay calm, don’t get overly emotional, and don’t put everything in one basket.