Just woke up and checked a few old NFT series floor prices, and it's pretty awkward: the narrative has cooled down, and the listings look like waiting in line for the wind to come. Honestly, liquidity is the key; with fewer buyers, even if royalties are "protecting creators," it just becomes a friction cost. Everyone prefers to flip in zero-royalty markets, claiming to support the community verbally, but their fingers still click on the cheaper options.



By the way, I saw that before and after the main chain upgrade/maintenance, people started guessing again whether the "ecosystem will migrate." I actually think most projects won't run; migration is much harder than tweeting. NFT is the same—if it’s going to heat up, it can’t rely on slogans; it needs someone willing to take over and provide long-term liquidity. In governance meetings, people talk about visions, and I usually listen silently. In the end, I just want to ask: who is actually paying to maintain this market depth? If no one answers, then... forget it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin