Today I saw another example of "coincidental transfers" on the chain: A makes a transfer to B, then a few minutes later C just happens to send B another transfer, and the comment section starts conspiracy theories... I'm just someone who loves paying attention to details, and after looking at it enough, I can usually break it down into a path: first check if the same routing is running (same aggregator / same batch relay address), then see if there's been a squeeze that caused the actual funds to be short, automated bots topping up, or if it's simply market-making / clearing scripts batching payments based on thresholds. Basically, many "coincidences" are just side effects of automation + fee/slippage control, not some mysterious phenomenon. The modularization and DeFi layer development are making developers super excited, which is normal for users who are confused— the more the chain is broken down, the more on-chain traces look like "random events"... Anyway, I’m used to first mapping out the path before deciding whether to join the fun.