I'm not very good at explaining those lofty models, but LST/re-staking, the more I look at it, seems like: the returns don't just appear out of nowhere, mostly it's "you lend out the same trust multiple times." To put it simply, originally staking was to help the chain guard and earn rewards; re-staking is taking that "guarding qualification/reputation" and giving it to other protocols as collateral, with others paying you some yield as rent.



The risk also follows this line: the more layers stacked, the more like a nesting doll. If one layer encounters an issue (contract vulnerabilities, penalties and confiscation rules written poorly, operators can't handle it), it could propagate all the way through. I used to think I was getting "steady compound interest," but in reality, it's "steady correlation." Recently, everyone’s arguing whether shared security is truly innovative or just stacking yields—I think both are right: it can improve efficiency, but it also tests who you really trust. Anyway, I don’t dare to go all-in now; I’m itching to try small positions first, to avoid turning FOMO into a joke again.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin