It's me again, always realizing after finishing a section that "participating in governance" is a thing. Recently, I’ve been looking at delegated voting for a few projects; they say decentralization, but in reality, they just bundle votes and hand them over to a few big addresses/organizations. Whether a proposal passes or not ultimately has little to do with retail investors. Honestly, governance tokens are about "who has the louder voice, who has the stable voting power." I also go on-chain to check out these proxy addresses, just to find reasons for myself: hmm, they seem pretty professional… but deep down I know, this is pretty much oligarchic.



By the way, in the group chat these days, there's been a heated debate about the boundaries of privacy coins and coin-mixing compliance—one side says privacy is a right, the other says don’t drag projects down with it. I feel governance is similar; everyone wants "rights," but when it comes to voting day, the most honest thing is still the hands: too lazy to look into it, delegate directly, or just not vote at all. Anyway, I’m usually the latecomer. Let’s leave it at that for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin