Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, everyone has been watching the main public chain upgrade/maintenance and guessing whether the ecosystem will move after the event.
I instead go and check the project's GitHub and audit reports...
Honestly, when a newbie reads "credibility," I only look at three things:
Is the code being actively updated (not just a bunch of commits overnight),
Does the audit report clearly state "what's not covered / risks still exist,"
And whether the upgrade permissions are multi-signature, who the signers are, if they can be changed, and if there's a time lock.
I admit I envy multi-signature setups a bit: the team’s process looks stable, while I can only pray at my keyboard that nothing big happens.
Anyway, while it's lively, I tend to avoid projects with opaque permissions and processes, so I can sleep more peacefully.