Recently, I saw more news about cross-chain bridge thefts, with half the comments criticizing and half shouting "wait for confirmation," basically implying that everyone defaults to trusting the on-chain process, and in the end, it still relies on human consensus as the safety net. My current expectation for privacy is quite low: on-chain is not anonymous, it's "not yet seriously linked to identities," and if compliance checks are really enforced, the paths are more transparent than you think.



I once encountered a situation where the oracle prices were acting erratically, and the prices in the pool looked ridiculously off. Someone in the group said to jump in and scoop the leak, but I kept watching those transactions and found them more and more suspicious... In the end, I just thought "if you don't understand it, don't move," closed the page and went to eat. Later, it indeed rolled back or paused, so I didn't make any profit or get hit. Forget it, ordinary people shouldn't expect to dance on the edge without falling. My bottom line is: only move money that can be clearly explained; if it can't be explained, just treat it as nonexistent.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin