Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Zuckerberg Testifies Teens Drive Just 1% of Meta Revenue in Addiction Trial
Zuckerberg Testifies Teens Drive Just 1% of Meta Revenue in Addiction Trial
Khac Phu Nguyen
Thu, February 19, 2026 at 11:25 PM GMT+9 2 min read
In this article:
META
-0.43%
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) is now at the center of what could become a defining courtroom battle over social media and youth safety, with Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg spending roughly six hours on the witness stand in Los Angeles Superior Court. The trial, which began Feb. 9 and is scheduled to run through the end of March, focuses on a 20-year-old plaintiff, Kaley G.M., who alleges that Instagram and Google’s YouTube contributed to years of mental health struggles. Under pointed questioning, Zuckerberg described enforcing Instagram’s age limits as very difficult, citing what he called a potentially meaningful number of users who may misrepresent their age. He testified that Meta has introduced proactive tools to detect and remove accounts used by children under 13, while characterizing the issue as a challenging, industrywide problem rather than a simple compliance gap.
The stakes could extend well beyond a single case. The proceeding is widely viewed as an early test for thousands of similar lawsuits targeting Meta and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), as well as TikTok and Snap (NYSE:SNAP), though the latter two are not participating after reaching confidential settlements in this matter. While the companies have denied wrongdoing and argue they have implemented guardrails for young users, they could face billions of dollars in potential damages if early juries rule against them. In court, plaintiff attorney Mark Lanier highlighted internal documents suggesting Meta viewed younger demographics as important to long-term platform success, including materials discussing pre-teens and older teenagers. Zuckerberg, however, sought to contextualize the financial impact, stating that teens account for about 1% of company revenue and emphasizing that Meta generates almost all of its revenue from advertising.
The testimony also revisited internal debates around age verification and child safety controls. Zuckerberg said Meta ultimately required new users to provide their date of birth when creating accounts, following internal discussions about privacy sensitivity, and added that he wished the company had reached that position sooner. At the same time, he argued that reliable age verification remains difficult, particularly for children without driver’s licenses, and suggested that shifting more responsibility to phone makers could be a very wise and simple approach. In recent years, Meta has rolled out additional measures, including teen accounts introduced in late 2024 that automatically restrict certain content and interactions for users under 18, updated default content settings to what it described as PG-13 for minors, and new limits on live streaming for younger teens. For investors, the outcome could shape not only potential legal exposure, but also how large platforms balance youth engagement, product design and regulatory scrutiny going forward.
Terms and Privacy Policy
Privacy Dashboard
More Info