Late-night DAO proposal writing is a bit overwhelming, on the surface it's all about "incentive alignment" and "community co-creation," but upon closer inspection of the parameters in the attachment, it's basically about redistributing power: who can propose, who can modify parameters, who gets the budget, how voting power is amplified... To put it simply, it's not about whether to vote or not, but whether you're willing to hand over the keys to a set of rules. Recently, the attention shifts with Meme/celebrity shoutouts becoming more obvious, and when everyone's emotions heat up, they get lazy about reading the terms, making newcomers most likely to take the last baton. Anyway, whenever I see "short-term subsidies," I first ask: after the subsidies end, who will hold the power? If you don't want to become fuel, it's okay to take it slow.