I really scared myself just now. When copying the voting link, I accidentally pasted another proposal link, almost voting for the side that “gives contributors extra points”… Luckily, I checked the contract page again in the last second, and my heartbeat shot up like a perpetual liquidation.



Honestly, many DAO proposals now seem to be “encouraging community participation,” but actually they are redistributing who gets to have a say: how points are calculated, who can review tasks, whether voting rights are tied to tokens, whether they can be delegated to a few big accounts. All layers are written quite gently, but the result might be that small investors are increasingly like clocking in at work. The airdrop season is the same; task platforms are becoming more strict with anti-witchcraft measures, and the points system turns the token farming crowd into KPI-driven grinders. The group that finally passes review ends up becoming the “insider circle” in governance.

Anyway, now before I vote, I first look at: who proposed, who benefits, who has veto power… Don’t get anxious again and tighten the noose around yourself with shaky hands. That’s all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin