Delegated voting, to put it simply, is like me, a task runner "delivery person," not having time to watch proposals every day, so I just hand my votes to someone who seems reliable. It's convenient, but the more convenient it is, the more it feels like we're raising big stakeholders... In the end, who does the governance tokens really govern? It often feels like they govern "people who can organize others, gather votes, and write proposals." What's more awkward is that on-chain, people are still arguing about validator income, MEV, and whether transaction ordering is fair or not. Retail investors are caught in the middle, still handing over their votes, as if they've also handed over the steering wheel. Anyway, I now prefer to vote fewer times but choose key proposals to click myself. Even if the bridge and wallet interactions are terrible, I have to grit my teeth and read through them; otherwise, there's really nothing left but to complain.