Recently, project teams have been saying "GitHub is very active, audits have been done, and multi-signature has been upgraded," to be honest, beginners want to see credibility. I think there's no need to be reassured by a few words. I would first glance at GitHub to see if someone has been consistently making changes, if the same group of people are repeatedly fixing issues, or if there's a sudden burst of updates in a week, which actually seems a bit like rushing to finish homework. Don't just look at the cover logo of the audit report; when you turn to the sections on "Known Risks/Unresolved Items," many pitfalls are actually written quite plainly, but everyone is too lazy to read... As for the multi-signature upgrade, what I care more about is: whether the signers are decentralized, if the threshold is reasonable, and whether there are time locks or delays, at least so that the vault can't be moved with a single click. Recently, the funding rates are extreme, and in the group, people are arguing whether to reverse or continue squeezing the bubble. I, for one, prefer to take it slow, paying more attention to these "whether they can hold back" details than shouting about the direction. That's all for now, I’m going to work.