Recently, everyone has been talking about AI Agents automating on-chain operations, which indeed saves effort, but I feel that for real implementation, there still needs to be someone overseeing as a safety net; otherwise, when something goes wrong, it’s all just “prayer mode.”


For example, with authorization steps, giving unlimited approval and then trying to revoke it later is quite troublesome; and with cross-chain bridges, if it gets stuck, you need to monitor the progress and know when to stop losses—it's not just about an agent saying “retrying.”
Not to mention issues like contract upgrades, front-end hijacking, phishing signatures—machines are “obedient,” but they don’t necessarily know when you’re being scammed.

Recently, the group has been discussing stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and various “de-pegging rumors,” and when emotions run high, it’s easy to make reckless moves.
My current habit is: run a small amount first, whitelist addresses, and manually review at scheduled times—better to be slow.
Honestly, long-term success depends not on talent but on these annoying habits—survive first, then talk about profits.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin