Recently, I've been seeing a bunch of AI Agents running around on the blockchain, which definitely saves effort, but I still prefer to leave a "human fallback" option. The most obvious areas are authorization and permission management—once a bot is given unlimited access, it's too late to react if something goes wrong later; also, cross-chain/signature operations where one mistake ruins everything—I’d rather slow down and confirm manually. Then there's the judgment of yield products—recently, everyone compares RWA and US Treasury yields with on-chain returns, which sounds smooth, but many "yields" on the chain are actually subsidies plus sentiment; Agents can quickly chase data, but if the narrative shifts or liquidity dries up, they won't make the kind of "forget it, I’m not playing anymore" decisions for you. Anyway, my current approach is: let it filter opportunities, calculate costs, monitor risks—fine. But when it comes to executing, I still do it myself.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin