"Spending from the treasury is always good news," that phrase sounds a bit awkward to me... I prefer to see whether the spending aligns with milestones: for example, issuing the budget first, then matching deliverables, audits, version numbers, and on-chain addresses stage by stage, something that can be reviewed afterward. Anyway, I will look into their past few expenditures to see if they keep paying the same external vendors or related addresses, or if they are genuinely paying for product development.

I'm now more cautious about the blockchain game sector. When inflation kicks in, studios enter the scene, and if the token price drops, it can easily spiral out of control. No matter how much the treasury invests in incentives, it’s like filling a pit... I’d rather go slower and see if the team is steadily building "usable stuff." You say, "Isn’t this micromanaging?"... I don’t know either, but after losing tokens or stepping into a pit once, I’ll be more honest about it.