Lately, I've been looking into the staking/sharing security approach, and the more I look, the more it seems like writing a "fee paper" into mysticism: stacking yields is fine, but the problem is that many people casually treat the risks as nonexistent. To put it simply, you're using the same economic guarantee to support multiple chains, and when something goes wrong, it won't be settled according to your expected "layered isolation"—more often, everything collapses together and accountability is pursued collectively.

What's even more amusing and a bit frustrating is that outside, Layer 2 solutions are still arguing over TPS, fees, and ecosystem subsidies, as if shouting louder can somehow boost security... Subsidies can buy traffic, but they can't buy the answer to "who pays when bad things happen." Anyway, when I see "adding another layer of yield," my first reaction isn't excitement, but to review the penalty conditions, correlations, and exit liquidity—otherwise, the perceived benefits might just be an illusion. That's all for now.