Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
In the Uniswap ecosystem, the leading decentralized finance project, a serious discussion has erupted regarding governance processes. Within the DAO (Data Entrance Account) structure of the project, a proposal is being considered to revoke tokens previously delegated to delegates. The proposal involves a buyback of a total of 12.5 million UNI tokens. These assets, valued at approximately $42 million, were allocated to the Uniswap fund and various delegates in 2022 and 2023 to increase participation in governance. The author of the proposal claims that although these tokens initially served their intended purpose — incentivizing governance activity — the ecosystem has now become sufficiently active. Therefore, revoking the delegated tokens could create a healthier governance structure. Experts believe that granting delegates voting rights without their own capital can create an imbalance between economic risk and voting power. This is seen as a potential issue that could lead to governance decisions not aligning with long-term interests. It is expected that the outcome of this discussion will set an important precedent not only for the Uniswap ecosystem but also for how governance models are formed within DAO structures overall.