Recently, people have been asking again where the returns from LST/re-staking come from. To put it simply, there are three sources: the original basic rewards from staking; some are willing to pay a premium for "more usability/more liquidity" (such as lending, market making, peer-to-peer swaps); and the layer of re-staking involves using the same security to serve as "collateral" for other protocols, which then give you rewards/subsidies. It sounds pretty attractive, but don’t ignore the risks: the most obvious is smart contract/trustee failures; secondly, de-pegging—when the market suddenly drops, everyone rushes to withdraw, and it gets uncomfortable; third, re-staking maximizes correlation—if A fails, it drags B down, and B drags your notes, creating a chain reaction. Recently, the L2 space has been arguing daily about TPS, fees, and ecosystem subsidies. I just find it amusing… Subsidies, like re-staking incentives, can boost short-term enthusiasm but may not sustain the cycle. Anyway, I’m going to keep my exposure minimal for now, understand the risks before interacting, and not rely on luck.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin